By David M. Gwynn
The looks in 1964 of A.H.M. Jones' "The Later Roman Empire 284-602: A Social, monetary, and Administrative Survey" remodeled the learn of the past due old global. during this quantity a couple of top students think again the influence of Jones' nice paintings, the impacts that formed his scholarship, and the legacy he left for later generations.
Read or Download A.H.M. Jones and the Later Roman Empire (Brill's Series on the Early Middle Ages, Volume 15) PDF
Best history books
A entire and authoritative brief advisor, this Very brief creation to Medieval Britain covers the institution of the Anglo-Norman monarchy within the early heart a long time, via to England's failure to dominate the British Isles and France within the later heart a while. Out of the turbulence got here improved senses of identification in Scotland, Wales, and eire.
Few issues have replaced the realm up to exploration. through mountain climbing the top mountains and diving the ocean's depths, explorers have elevated our wisdom of the wildlife. This publication celebrates the explorers of either heritage and the fashionable international. contains black-and-white photos and illustrations, word list, extra studying, and index.
- Lord Eight Wind of Suchixtlan and the Heroes of Ancient Oaxaca: Reading History in the Codex Zouche-Nuttall
- Postmodern Imperialism: Geopolitics and the Great Games
- Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945
- Toy Story (BFI Film Classics)
Additional info for A.H.M. Jones and the Later Roman Empire (Brill's Series on the Early Middle Ages, Volume 15)
Further, there is a revealing parenthesis in the preface, coming just after this sentence: “This is not to say that I have not read and profited from many modern books and articles”. It reads: “particularly those whose authors were so kind as to send me offprints”. The Professor of Ancient History at Cambridge receives many papers and monographs ex officio. If he is a world-figure, his post is the heavier. And that is just the start: the “offprints” of the parenthesis may stand as proxy for the whole range of communication that Jones was involved in with scholars, beginning with colleagues, ex-students and current students.
But though he may have swung away from the traditional presentation 7 8 Jones (1952) 354. As is noted by Liebeschuetz (1992) 2. 9 These words presage Jones’ own preoccupation with Roman legal and constitutional history in his last years, which marked something of a return to the fold of traditional history-writing. In any case, Jones made a significant concession to the established historiographical tradition, in beginning his Later Roman Empire with over 300 pages of narrative. Even his greatest admirers wish he had not done so.
Wolf Liebeschuetz states: “the influence was one of subject, method and ‘scholarly morality’, but not of views”. Jones’ methodology meant that he included very few references to the secondary literature in his publications. This neglect of the secondary material was regularly criticised. 27 In the same passage, Jones goes on to explain “how slender is the evidence for many modern theories, which often pass untested on the authority of a great name”. Therefore, for Jones, as long as there was evidence of close working from the primary texts, historians had little need to refer to the secondary literature, which was the product of minds situated in the modern world.